Friday, November 14, 2014

Contextual Analysis-rough draft

“Meet the Mormons? What is that?” I asked myself when my sister me to listen to a new song by our very own David Archuleta. Mr. Archuleta is from the same city as me, good old Murray, Utah. In fact, we went to the same high school. All of this to say, I was not opposed to listen to his new song but had no idea what the title under the song was all about. I proceeded to ask my little sister about the title and that is when she told me it was a new documentary coming out about our church. I didn’t give it much thought after that, the song didn’t even strike me at first but little did I know how big this song and movie would become, even if just in the world of Mormons. The purpose of my contextual analysis of Meet the Mormons is to explore how social media impacted various contexts as it relates to the film.
Then I started to see it. “Nieniediologues” posted an Instagram picture of her talking to the press about the film. Another post featured her and David Archuleta as she mentioned “Glorious,” the song David sung for the film. This is when I realized this show was going to be significant. The social media guns had been pulled out; this film meant business. No surprise there since we live in a world where promoting ideas we care about is at our fingertips. Paul Bond (2014) supports this idea when he states, “The church is advertising the movie on TV and radio in Utah, Idaho and Arizona where many of the nation’s 6 million Mormons live, and then relying on the faithful to do much of the rest of the marketing” (para. 11).
 This brings me to the first mediated context, the social context. The social context has a lot to do with the roles we play and the inherent rules that accompany those roles. The role in this case is being a Mormon. Stephanie Nielson, David Archuleta, and many other significant names within the LDS bubble, took seriously their role as Mormon as well as social media user and went to work, posting and promoting. Post after post on Instagram debuts people in front of movie marquee, raving about the film. The social context has a lot to do with networking and spreading the word and that is exactly what is happening.
One vlog I found while researching the film, made by Shay Carl, was full of exuberance for the premiere of the movie he was about to see, not to mention the fact that he was able to meet Jeffrey R. Holland, a General Authority of the church. The impact of the vlog and Shay’s excitement was important because social media is empowering the cultural context. The LDS faith is a culture and when the public has access to a blog that has as its star, a member of the faith who is so full of life and thrilled about what he is sharing, that thrill is contagious and possesses the ability to pique curiosity. “Okay, so here we are, at the premiere with the other Mormons on Youtube…” says Shay with a zeal that makes you want to be a part of something. My point is, social media is setting the stage for the cultural context to be influential. Not only are Shay’s attempts representative of the cultural context but it also proves the power of citizen journalism and all that has come to mean.
An article in the Deseret News hits on another cultural concept that is unique to this film. “What makes this tricky is the bulk of the movie’s target audience-namely members of the LDS church-are not expected to attend the movie on Sunday because of the faith’s emphasis on Sabbath observance, Roberts said” (Evans, 2014, Challenges).  This speaks a lot about the culture the film is about. Interesting to note though, in the same article, Whitney Evans cites a YouTube video of Elder Jeffrey R. Holland explaining that the film “…is informational only, and not meant for proselytizing” (Leaderships Report). The LDS faith and culture has received a lot of attention throughout the years and through this film, which was first meant to be exclusively for preview at the Legacy Theatre on Temple Square in Salt Lake City, the Church is anticipating the public to be more informed about the LDS faith. 

In my opinion, the psychological context of this movement is paramount. When discussed in class, I wrote down “emotion” next to this context and I think this is most adequately represented by the myriad of tweets, Facebook statuses, and Instagram posts that continue flooded feeds in response to the film.



Excitement about the film through emotional responses like this really speaks for the psychological context of the Meet the Mormons film.

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Edward Snowden

Is Edward Snowden a patriot or a traitor?
This is a loaded question. 
I asked my sister and one of our friends if they knew who Edward Snowden was. They did not. This surprised me. However, I had to remind myself that before my Digital Revolution class last Spring, I would have answered the question the same way. 
Patriot. 
That's my answer. I think Edward Snowden is a patriot. He wants the public to choose. Kursty talked today in class about how she likes the emails she receives as a result of cookies and google sending in their robot. Interesting thought. Kursty said she has nothing to hide. I don't either. Then Eric said if he accomplished the task of educating students about the real story of privacy, perhaps that is enough... or at least a start. Now we know. And now we choose. Now we carry the responsibility of being self-aware. Bring that full-circle, back to Snowden, he wants the public to choose. Are the government's practices okay with you? 
Patriot.